Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Father Knows Best

Hazlewood Power Station by night.
 
Hazelwood Power Station and Mine are located in Victoria’s Latrobe Valley, 150 kilometres east of Melbourne. The complex covers 3554 hectares. Hazelwood Mine produces around 18 million tonnes of brown coal annually to fuel the 1675 MW capacity power station. The business directly employs around 500 staff, with 300 alliance contractors.

Hazelwood supplies up to 25 per cent of Victoria’s electricity needs- some eight per cent of the National Electricity Market.

Now for an interesting take from Aaron Tyrrell, editor, Money Morning.

"The Australian says the government might buy the Hazelwood power plant for $2.5 billion and shut it down. Why? Because it is Australia's 'dirtiest' coal-fired power plant. $2.5 billion is a lot to pay for a toy you can't play with.

Doesn't it make you wonder what the point of the carbon tax is? Punish polluters and 'save' the world from man-made climate change? Or buy 'green' votes? Surely it's not to bribe 'dirty' businesses to die quietly! But the company that owns Hazelwood - International-GDF Suez - has a choice. Lethal injection or crucifixion?

'We'll take the less painful option, thanks!'

Yes, Hazelwood pumps out 3% of Australia's total carbon emissions a year. But in the grand scheme, it's not a lot.

According to the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Total from 2009 on the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency's website, that was 16.9 million tonnes in 2009. A small part of the 564.5 million tonnes pumped out that year: It's roughly 5% of what the whole power sector pumped out in 2008. Take that away and there's still the other 95% to worry about.

This $2.5 billion would just give this power co. a chance to pay out its workers and stick the anti-carbon cash in some new venture. International-GDF Suez might sink it into nuclear power. Or coal-seam gas. Or geothermal or solar or hydro electricity. (That way it could sweep up a few green grants as well.) In short, it could profit from the carbon hysteria. Twice! Once as the scapegoat. And once as the saviour.
 
As to which direction would be the best for it to take, it depends where you see the brave new energy world heading."
Thank you Mr Tyrrell for that valuable information.

Where will the energy come from to fill that 25% loss to the power needs of the Victorian people?

I think if you asked Bob Brown this question he would venture that people will just have to endure power cuts whilst "renewable energy" takes up the backlog - if ever! And you could bet your bottom dollar - that will be all you will have left - that Bob Brown's cosy little love nest in Tasmania won't suffer any heating problems!

So we, the people of Australia through a cadre of idiots we elected, are going to spend (waste?) 2.5 billion dollars to reduce our carbon emissions by 5% and the energy output of Victoria by 25% and we don't have a strategy by which to replace this energy?
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment