Monday, March 28, 2011

"Oh Shit! I Just Told the Truth". - Commissioner For Climate Change, Flannery

Professor Tim Flannery, the Commissioner for Climate Change said on radio on Friday, 25th March 2011 
" If the world as a whole cut all emissions tomorrow the average temperature of the planet is not going to drop in several hundred years, perhaps as much as a thousand years...”.

Julia and The Musician are lining up to kick your socialist arse Timmy boy. Telling the truth in that company just ain't on!

The Federal Labor/Green alliance government, not content with wasting the taxpayers money on the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, is wasting another $5.6 million dollars  on a Climate Commission headed by Tim Flannery. 

This Commission according to Minister Greg Combet  “It will provide expert advice on climate change science and impacts” .  

Well read on to see some of Tim Flannery’s previous “expert advice on climate change”:

That is Tim Flannery with no qualifications in Climate Science, he has a doctorate in Palaeontology.

This is the Tim Flannery that said in 2005 that droughts could leave Sydneys Dams dry in just two years.

The Tim Flannery that said that most climate skeptics were men over 65.

The Professor Tim Flannery that said in 2008  “The water problem is so severe for Adelaide that it may run out of water by early 2009.” (Adelaide’s Dams are almost full)

The Tim Flannery who said in 2007 that “Sydney and Brisbane, water supplies are so low they need desalinated water urgently, possibly in as little as 18 months”. No desal plant is being used anywhere, because all the three cities have too much water in their Dams.

The Tim Flannery who said in 2004 that “I think there is a fair chance Perth will be the 21st century’s first ghost metropolis” . Ten years into the 21st Century, Perth is still there and for its size the most prosperous city in Australia..

The Tim Flannery who said in 2008 (three years ago) that “in five years there’ll be no Arctic ice cap“. Well the Arctic Icecap is still there, but Tim Flannery says there are still two years left.

Tim Flannery who said in 2007 ” I think it’s too late for debate now”, and have no doubt that Tim Flannery wants a Carbon Tax, he said in 2007 “Carbon tax is the way forward” , so much for the ‘independence’.  

Tim Flannery is just a propagandist for the Labor Government.

Its an indication of how much this Labor Government is out of touch with the people, that they somehow think the appointment of a serial alarmist and exaggerator will be a PR positive.

UPDATE: Tim Flannery was interviewed the next day (11/2/11) on 891 Adelaide by Ian Henschke. Three times Ian Henschke asked him “are you a climate scientist”, and three times Tim Flannery squirmed and evaded the question.  

Tim Flannery gets $180,000 per year for a part time job, and he is not even a climate scientist.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Caption Contest!

Hello Punters!  Here is Climatechange Truth's first caption contest of the year. Sorry no prizes just a bellyfull of laughs.

Post your caption below under "Post a Comment". Go for it!

Saturday, March 26, 2011


Thank you Australian Climate Madness for this insightful little snippet

Friday, March 25, 2011

Thousands Rally Against Carbon Tax

Unbelievable Liar - Never To Be Trusted Again !

The Greens Glove Puppet has made the International Media big time. Here is an article by British science writer and legal analyst specializing in anti-corruption, John O'Sullivan

"A concerted Australian grassroots campaign holds rallies in six major cities to protest the imposition of climate change taxes and demand new election.

Thousands of protestors are challenging Prime Minister, Julia Gillard's, “undemocratic” climate policies demanding either an immediate election or that her government drops all such proposals. They say imposing the taxes would be a betrayal of democratic principles because Gillard was elected with no mandate to raise any such taxes.

Speaking at the event will be leading MPs and scientists opposed to climate taxes. In response one Government Minister (Albanese) labeled the rally participants as 'ratbags.'

A press release by organizer, Viv Forbes, Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition (March 23, 2011) announces that 22 diverse associations representing tens of thousands of Aussies will put the Gillard government’s environmental tax policies to the test. The Carbon Sense Coalition claims “thousands of Australians all over the country have signed a letter to Prime Minister Julia Gillard opposing the carbon tax.”

Skeptics say the government is wrongly basing its decisions on the discredited science of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

ClimateTaxes Will Achieve Little or No Impact

Forbes adds:
"This tax on carbon dioxide will have no effect whatsoever on global climate, little effect on the production of carbon dioxide but a large effect on the cost of living and job prospects for Australians. This is merely a wealth redistribution scheme where most of the wealth will be consumed on compliance, regulation, red tape, subsidies and price supports for the Climate Change Industry."

Protesters say any such tax would hurt the Australian economy and gravely impact families, imposing an additional $300 a year on household energy bills. Australia produces only one percent of global emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, based on IPCC calculations, such a tax levied for 50 years will reduce global temperatures by an indiscernible 0.015 degrees centigrade and 2mm rise in sea levels.

Negative public opinion polls also appear to be linked to the growing number of embarrassing revelations undermining the credibility of the IPCC for using dubious non-peer reviewed findings.

Disillusionment in the greenhouse gas theory of climate change is increasing among independent non-government funded scientists. Carbon dioxide is a so-called greenhouse gas and comprises just 0.04 percent of the atmosphere. Environmentalists and leaders of some the world’s wealthiest nations championed the greenhouse gas theory as a promising vehicle for cap and trade green taxes.

No Discernible Human Influence on Climate

Aussie climate skeptics such as Malcolm Roberts, have been at the forefront of promoting science that discredits the IPCC claims. Roberts published his own lucid rebuttal of the man-made global warming theory with, 'Two Dead Elephants in Parliament.'

Roberts drew attention to the IPCC's Table 2.11 (2007) that reveals by the IPCC’s own admission, it has ‘low’ or ‘very low’ understanding of 80 percent of all factors impacting climate. In their Third Report the IPCC claimed that as CO2 levels increased then global temperatures would increase. However, since 1998, despite unending rises in atmospheric CO2, global temperatures have fallen.

On such evidence, along with other arguments, the protesters say there is no compelling reason to show human emissions of carbon dioxide is causing any climate change. Thus the imposition of climate taxes is both scientifically unjustified and impacts negatively on economic freedom.

Wide Cross Section of Society Against the New Tax

Organizers claim these are gatherings of Australian citizens with a peaceful demonstration message. There are no projected figures of the expected turnout but interest has been considerable according to the Consumers and Taxpayers Association. They say they had over 100,000 hits on their website within the two weeks leading up to the rally.

The cities involved in the ‘No Carbon Tax’ protest are Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth. The six rallies are expected to comprise many representatives of diverse groups including “Young Australians, Working Families, Students, Workers, Small Business Owners and Senior Citizens.”
Copyright John O'Sullivan. Contact the author to obtain permission for republication.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

So Labor and the Greens Reckon We're Extremists Because We Don't Want a Carbon Tax?

Maybe Bob Brown Has a Plan to Stop Cow Farts Causing Global Warming!
Yesterday, the 4000 Australians, the working families, pensioners, blue collar workers, who reached into their own pockets to express their democratic right over the fury they have about the direction this government is going, received a response from politicians we elected to our nation’s parliament and it was this.

Nick Champion, Member for Wakefield, called us “extremists with all the credibility of a Dungeons and Dragons convention”.

Minister Wong, in the height of conceit and arrogance, disparagingly referred to us as “that audience”. 

Senator Feeney interjected in the Senate and called us “members of the Ku Klux Klan”.

These comments are the height of absolute idiocy, they are disgusting. They show in direct light their improper motives and duplicity in using the term “deniers”. 

Labor with comments such as these deserve neither the respect nor the support of the Australian people and Labor should unequivocally apologise. They did not impugn the character of us in the parliament, where we expect it as part of this circus, but they have impugned the character of the salt of the fabric of the Australian people.

Ms Gillard and the Labor party,we are not “that audience”, we are not “extremists”,we  are not part of a “dungeons and dragons convention” we are not part of the “Ku Klux Klan”. 

We are the people who gave you your job and  your actions are despicable.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

When Is a Tax Not a Tax? - When it's a Lie!

Two Wind Machines - Both Useless!
Ms Gillard claimed: ―There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.‖
(Channel 10, 16 August 2010)
On the Friday before the election Ms Gillard stated categorically: ―I rule out a carbon tax.‖ (Front page of The Australian, 20 August 2010)
Wayne Swan: ―What we rejected is this hysterical allegation that somehow we are moving towards a carbon tax.” (Meet the Press, 15 August 2010)
Mr Swan: ―We have made our position very clear, we have ruled it out.” (7.30 Report, 12 August 2010)
On 24 February 2011, Ms Gillard, flanked by the Greens, announced she wanted to introduce a carbon tax on 1 July 2012. She said this might morph into an Emissions Trading Scheme 3 to 5 years later. But it could be with us for years.
A $26 a tonne carbon price would:
Push up electricity bills by an extra $300 a year, per household
Petrol would rise by 6.5 cents a litre
Gas would rise by up to 10 per cent in the first year
Groceries would rise
Manufacturing jobs would be put at risk
Ms Gillard won’t say what the carbon price would be, or what compensation would be offered to households and businesses, or whether petrol would be included, or even when / if it would turn into a floating-price ETS
Nobody can now trust any significant statements from Julia Gillard
Labor is using the hung parliament as a weak excuse for a carbon tax
Ms Gillard was cagey about the inclusion of petrol in her carbon tax when she announced it on February 24, 2011. She said the matter was yet to be discussed and resolved – her own paper however, says it is on the table.
But Greens MP Adam Bandt let the cat out of the bag when he told Sky News on February 25:
―We are very pleased that the paper that's been released and the agreement that we've reached has
transport as being included in a carbon pricing mechanism.‖
Soon after the carbon tax announcement, Greens climate spokeswoman Christine Milne pushed for petrol to be included in the scheme, which earned a rebuke from Ms Gillard. She said on Sunday February 27 that Senator Milne’s comments on the inclusion of petrol ―were not appropriate in the sense these discussions are still to come‖.
Ms Gillard has since admitted her fixed-price carbon scheme would indeed function like a tax.
It is a tax, it is the definition of a tax. She just cannot bring herself to call it a tax.
Labor’s carbon tax: $114 billion between now and 2020 (according to Treasury modelling of the CPRS)
Who Pays? - You Do!

Monday, March 21, 2011

"Straight From the Dark Side of the USA"

On the first day of the attack, 'The Coalition of the Willing", including the US, deployed 112 Cruise Missiles against Libya.

Conservatively these missiles cost $600,000 each!

Total cost for day one, Cruise missiles alone, $67 million.

At the same time, tent cities have appeared across America because the country 'does not have enough money'. 

Never enough money to keep people alive and in decent, dignified conditions - always enough to wage war 

Sunday, March 20, 2011

The Devils Haemorrhoids!

Rarely do you come across a person who can tell it like it really is! 
Haemorrhoids and all

Such a person is Les Visible.

I have posted his latest article here because I believe it will be sabotaged and taken down.

""May your noses always be repelled by the smell of Rupert Murdoch".

The UK probably has the biggest collection of slime rags per capita in the world and there are all sorts of players from the House of Lords; Lords Rothermere, Northcliffe, and Beaverbrook are a few and the disgraced Conrad Black from across the water. I’ve even left some out. To a man, they are all pro-Zionist and all qualify as Zio-Ogres. The degree of sleaze is breath-taking, garbage in and garbage out.

The Smut king of all time though, is Rupert Murdoch and
here you get an idea of how far his Kingdom of Garbage and Swill extends. Rupert makes his home on the sunny side Riviera of The Devil’s Anus; a living hemorrhoidal entity, a King of Shit, crowned with a viral toilet bowl in the darkest regions of the Kali Yuga. You’d be hard pressed to find a more influential profile of evil anywhere in the world.

All of these base and heinous scoundrels come out of The Crown Colonies; England, Canada and Australia. Rupert comes out of Australia, where he must have been spawned in one of those hidden, experimental labs in The Outback, far from any living thing besides the random serial killers of Wolf Creek and nine tenths of the poisonous snakes in the world, centipedes, crocodiles ...and assorted, all of whom had DNA extracted for the task. Of course you’d have to head for that strip from Cairns to Darwin to get the collection. People like Rupert are not born in any normal fashion. They are created by the same corrosive science that put all those nuclear reactors in Japan and then put them under
the protection of Israeli security. What isn’t guarded by Israeli security? Your security and well being are two things that instantly come to mind. The reason Israeli security is there is because otherwise the biggest threat would be Israel, which it already is; irony?

Rupert Murdoch is the world media’s point man for Rothschild/Israeli interests on this planet. It appears they really do own the material world at the moment and are the main motivation for The Apocalypse.

Helen Thomas just failed the litmus test but I suppose she can be somewhat forgiven. She doesn’t even know who Glenn Beck is. I am guessing she has never looked too deeply beyond the margins of her basic interests and chosen task. She’s not much of a researcher. I like how she noted that the Playboy interviewer was a Jew and pointed out several other tangential associations of the same. She doesn’t go anywhere near Fox News and you might be as puzzled as I that she doesn’t drop in now and then to see what the competition is doing. It says, within her limited scope, that she is an honest purist and doesn’t want to sully her beautiful mind (grin) with any contact with Mr. HIV’s efforts to put every living thing in the emergency room of soul peril.

Does anyone doubt the need for an Apocalypse? The next couple of days could well give us one more enduring example that it is very much here. The signs are right and the times are spot on. So long as men like Rupert Murdoch are allowed to prosper and perform, the world needs a wake-up call and life under murderous scum like this dark icon, are all the evidence we need that a great price must be paid, until a traveling guillotine comes into effect for all such miserable creatures.

It’s been said, “By their works ye shall know them”. In that case, can you imagine what must go on in Rupert’s private life? Can you imagine what it must be like inside his mind? I can see flaming wreckage and souls crying out in torment, as Rupert travels in this thoughts thinking,
“How can I increase it”?

I am near finished with my next novel, “The Curious Tale of Ash and the Whine” (still looking for people to read what’s done; it won’t hurt sales because the final part and the ending are something Poe might appreciate... criticism before publication is a lot more useful than criticism after the fact. I’m not into 20-20 hindsight. Heck, I sent it out to a couple of people who asked to read it and they haven’t even answered me.) ...and there is a character in there based on Rupert. Heck, unlike most books that have that big disclaimer about no one being recognizable, everyone is but... who is who? Aye that’s the rubdown. Hey, go ahead and sue me. Not only do you give me publicity that money can’t buy but I don’t have anything.

I do in this book something very similar to what Rupert does in reverse. I say things that I have never seen said in this kind of format; there must be a reason for it (grin) and they are true. Rupert says things (through his proxies) that are beyond anything I’ve ever seen for consistency of prevarication, more so than anything I had previously seen, in any similar Zio-Ogre operation of any size.

Rupert, like the rest of his Israeli whore handmaidens, likes to fabricate polls about what the public thinks, alongside of photos of exaggerated cows udders (got milk?), to tell the public what it thinks, so that the public won’t be confused about it. These polls are lies from the ground up. The majority of the world DOES NOT support Israel and the majority of world leaders do, in opposition to the very principal they were put into office to fulfill. The war in Libya now continues because Israeli-hired mercenaries are carrying it out. Of course, there is no mention of this in the catamite media.

These polls are skewed to push, gay marriage (part of the effort to destroy Christianity); by the way, opposition to gay marriage has nothing to do with one’s perspective on being gay. Everyone is gay in one life or another, just as everyone gets to be all the colors and creeds. They are skewered to push the wars, economic policies, slander of any opposition and whatever the hell else they want to push. Most of the public KNOWS that 9/11 was an inside job but... yeah, you know.

All of this comes at the behest of Israel that was created out of myth on many- every- level(s) and is really just an organized crime syndicate and the seat of The Dark Lord on this planet. They needed to be a country because then... then you can get away with a whole lot more. As people like Murdoch, publish endless lies about this mass-murdering, mob enterprise and as it is echoed by lesser minions everywhere, the scope and details of Israel’s crimes are more and more in a position to come face to face with The Apocalypse. This is all being engineered from the force of the approaching avatar as he precipitates down from the inner planes, sweeping all of the entrenched malefactors before him, into the material plane for judgment; nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.

This is the reason that Israeli interests and the long term agenda of the same have been becoming increasingly more public. They are actually working against their intended results by the manipulation of an unseen hand. They were quietly going about it in the shadows for a long time and now they’re trumpeting themselves in public. That’s not good strategy. It’s the same thing that is causing world leaders and so many public figures to identify and define themselves, to their lasting shame, for a few pieces of silver or the lack of necessary courage and integrity. Everything is seen and will get its earned imprimatur when the time arrives. They’re singing their song before hand. After comes the backhand.

Rupert, I wouldn’t want to be you, although I know there’s a part of you in all of us, more or less restrained, whereas you are the absolute liberty as license, of those bacteria you are the poster boy for. What the ingenious mind of the cosmos has in store for you, I could not guess but one day you will hear that word, “incoming”, in both senses of the word.

As a possible digression, let me say that so many of these new age gurus who declare Obama as a ‘lightworker’, work for the same source you do, like the ones who come up with absurd and commercially directed efforts, aptly titled, “
Honoring your Rage”, or “Rampage of Love”. They’re all out there looking for one more way to say, “Send me your money”! ...until they wind up selling things like this and this. One should take a gander at the degree to which this whole ‘industry’ has raised trivia to an art-form. They’re sunbathing on the soft side of the Riviera, across the inlet from Rupert. It’s like the way T’ai Chi relates to Kung Fu. I’ll be putting up a post today here that explains what I intend to do with any money that comes my way and which is being set up before hand as a protection against what happens to so many people when they get this $ in their eyes instead of pupils. Isn’t the pupil one of the places where the master is supposed to live?

Rupert, you are a boil on the fat ass of humanity that no longer resembles the term. You’re an infected sore, crying out for penicillin. You are an STD that is the product of a “fuck ‘em all” mentality. Your day is arriving, Rupert and we shall see the meaning of that phrase; “Sunlight is the best disinfectant”. Your day is coming.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Carbon Tax to Cost Every Family At Least $2,500 Per Year Extra!

Greg Combet coined another lie to deceive the Australian public, naming the "carbon dioxide tax" a "pollution tax". 

Combet spins yet another yarn in The Daily Telegraph full once again of misrepresentations and half-truths, in a desperate attempt to justify a pointless "tax on everything".

Here are the leading 10 lies the Greens and the Gillard Government spew forth:

1. We must address carbon (sic) pollution (sic) by introducing a carbon (sic) tax.

The argument is not about carbon or a carbon tax, but rather about carbon dioxide emissions and a carbon dioxide tax, to be levied on the fuel and energy sources that power the Australian economy.
Carbon dioxide is a natural and vital trace gas in Earth’s atmosphere, an environmental benefit without which our planetary ecosystems could not survive. Increasing carbon dioxide makes many plants grow faster and better, and helps to green the planet.
To call atmospheric carbon dioxide a pollutant is an abuse of language, logic and science.

2. We need to link much more closely with the climate emergency.
There is no “climate emergency”; the term is a deliberate lie. Global average temperature at the end of the 20th century fell well within the bounds of natural climate variation, and was in no way unusually warm, or cold, in geological terms.
Earth’s temperature is currently cooling slightly.

3. Putting a price on carbon (sic) will punish the big polluters (sic).
A price on carbon dioxide will impose a deliberate financial penalty on all energy users, but especially energy-intensive industries. These imaginary “big polluters” are part of the bedrock of the Australian economy. Any cost impost on them will be passed straight down to consumers.
It is consumers of all products who will ultimately pay, not the industrialists or their shareholders.

4. Putting a price on carbon (sic) is the right thing to do; it’s in our nation’s interest.
The greatest competitive advantage of the Australian economy is cheap energy generated by coal-fired power stations.
To levy an unnecessary tax on this energy source is economic vandalism that will destroy jobs and reduce living standards for all Australians.

5. Putting a price on carbon (sic) will result in lower carbon dioxide emissions.
Economists know well that an increase in price of some essential things causes little reduction in usage. This is true for both energy (power) and petrol, two commodities that will be particularly hit by a tax on carbon dioxide emissions.
Norway has had an effective tax on carbon dioxide since the early 1990s, and the result has been a 15% INCREASE in emissions.
At any reasonable level ($20-50/t), a carbon dioxide tax will result in no reduction in emissions.

6. We must catch up with the rest of the world, who are already taxing carbon dioxide emissions.
They are not. All hope of a global agreement on emissions reduction has collapsed with the failure of the Copenhagen and Cancun climate meetings. The world’s largest emitters (USA and China) have made it crystal clear that they will not introduce carbon dioxide tax or emissions trading.
The Chicago Climate Exchange has collapsed, chaos and deep corruption currently manifests the European exchange and some US states are withdrawing from anti-carbon dioxide schemes.
Playing “follow the leader” is not a good idea when the main leader (the EU) has a sclerotic economy characterised by lack of employment and the flight of manufacturers overseas.

7. Australia should show leadership, by setting an example that other countries will follow.
Self-delusion doesn’t come any stronger than this.
For Australia to introduce a carbon dioxide tax ahead of the large emitting nations is to render our whole economy to competitive and economic disadvantage for no gain whatsoever.

8. We must act, and the earlier we act on climate change the less painful it will be.
The issue at hand is global warming, not the catch-all, deliberately ambiguous term climate change.
Trying to prevent hypothetical “dangerous” warming by taxing carbon dioxide emissions will be ineffectual, and is all pain for no gain.

9. The cost of action on carbon (sic) pollution (sic) is less than the cost of inaction.
This statement is fraudulent. Implementing a carbon dioxide tax will carry large costs for workers and consumers, but bring no measurable cooling (or other change) for future climate.
For Australia, the total cost for a family of four of implanting a carbon dioxide tax will exceed $2,500/yr* – whereas even eliminating all of Australia’s emissions might prevent planetary warming of 0.01 deg. C by 2100.

10. There is no do-nothing option in tackling climate change.
However, it is also the case that there is no demonstrated problem of “dangerous” global warming. Instead, Australia continues to face many self-evident problems of natural climate change and hazardous natural climate events. A national climate policy is clearly needed to address these issues.
The appropriate, cost-effective policy to deal with Victorian bushfires, Queensland floods, droughts, northern Australian cyclones and long-term cooling or warming trends is the same.
It is to prepare carefully for, and efficaciously deal with and adapt to, all such events and trends whether natural or human-caused, as and when they happen. Spending billions of dollars on expensive and ineffectual carbon dioxide taxes serves only to reduce wealth and our capacity to address these only too real world problems.
Preparation for, and adaptation to, all climate hazard is the key to formulation of a sound national climate policy.

Courtesy of Australian Climate Madness and Professor Bob Carter, a geologist, environmental scientist and Emeritus Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs.

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The Green Hate of Humanity

The only underlying theme that makes sense of all Greenie policies is hatred of people. Hatred of other people has been a Greenie theme from way back. 

In a report titled "The First Global Revolution" (1991, p. 104) published by the "Club of Rome", a Greenie panic outfit, we find the following statement: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."  

See here for many more examples of prominent Greenies saying how much and how furiously they hate you.

The modern environmental movement arose out of the wreckage of the New Left. 

They call themselves Green because they're too yellow to admit they're really Reds. 

So Lenin's birthday was chosen to be the date of Earth Day. 

Even a moderate politician like Al Gore has been clear as to what is needed. In "Earth in the Balance", he wrote that saving the planet would require a "wrenching transformation of society".  

One final fact about The Greens Most Hated Gas, CO2. 

CO2 is a trace gas that comprises less than 0.04% of the earths atmosphere!

Monday, March 14, 2011

"Never have so few fooled so many for so long, ever." -- Ninad D. Sheth

Doncha Just Love This Little Item!

Wind Turbines Lead To Mass Pollution In China!

In China, the True Cost of a Clean(?), Green Wind Power Experiment The Greens Don't Want You To Know About: 

Pollution on a Disastrous Scale!

"On the outskirts of one of China’s most polluted cities, an old farmer stares despairingly out across an immense lake of bubbling toxic waste covered in black dust. He remembers it as fields of wheat and corn.
Yan Man Jia Hong is a dedicated Communist. At 74, he still believes in his revolutionary heroes, but he despises the young local officials and entrepreneurs who have let this happen.

‘Chairman Mao was a hero and saved us,’ he says. ‘But these people only care about money. They have destroyed our lives.’

Vast fortunes are being amassed here in Inner Mongolia; the region has more than 90 per cent of the world’s legal reserves of rare earth metals, and specifically neodymium, the element needed to make the magnets in the most striking of green energy producers, wind turbines.

Live has uncovered the distinctly dirty truth about the process used to extract neodymium: it has an appalling environmental impact that raises serious questions over the credibility of so-called green technology.
The reality is that, as Britain flaunts its environmental credentials by speckling its coastlines and unspoiled moors and mountains with thousands of wind turbines, it is contributing to a vast man-made lake of poison in northern China. 

This is the deadly and sinister side of the massively profitable rare-earths industry that the ‘green’ companies profiting from the demand for wind turbines would prefer you knew nothing about. Hidden out of sight behind smoke-shrouded factory complexes in the city of Baotou, and patrolled by platoons of security guards, lies a five-mile wide ‘tailing’ lake. It has killed farmland for miles around, made thousands of people ill and put one of China’s key waterways in jeopardy.

This vast, hissing cauldron of chemicals is the dumping ground for seven million tons a year of mined rare earth after it has been doused in acid and chemicals and processed through red-hot furnaces to extract its components.

Rusting pipelines meander for miles from factories processing rare earths in Baotou out to the man-made lake where, mixed with water, the foul-smelling radioactive waste from this industrial process is pumped day after day. No signposts and no paved roads lead here, and as we approach security guards shoo us away and tail us. When we finally break through the cordon and climb sand dunes to reach its brim, an apocalyptic sight greets us: a giant, secret toxic dump, made bigger by every wind turbine we build.

The lake instantly assaults your senses. Stand on the black crust for just seconds and your eyes water and a powerful, acrid stench fills your lungs.

For hours after our visit, my stomach lurched and my head throbbed. We were there for only one hour, but those who live in Mr Yan’s village of Dalahai, and other villages around, breathe in the same poison every day.

Retired farmer Su Bairen, 69, who led us to the lake, says it was initially a novelty – a multi-coloured pond set in farmland as early rare earth factories run by the state-owned Baogang group of companies began work in the Sixties.
‘At first it was just a hole in the ground,’ he says. ‘When it dried in the winter and summer, it turned into a black crust and children would play on it. Then one or two of them fell through and drowned in the sludge below. Since then, children have stayed away.’

As more factories sprang up, the banks grew higher, the lake grew larger and the stench and fumes grew more overwhelming.
‘It turned into a mountain that towered over us,’ says Mr Su. ‘Anything we planted just withered, then our animals started to sicken and die.’

People too began to suffer. Dalahai villagers say their teeth began to fall out, their hair turned white at unusually young ages, and they suffered from severe skin and respiratory diseases. Children were born with soft bones and cancer rates rocketed.

Official studies carried out five years ago in Dalahai village confirmed there were unusually high rates of cancer along with high rates of osteoporosis and skin and respiratory diseases. The lake’s radiation levels are ten times higher than in the surrounding countryside, the studies found.

Since then, maybe because of pressure from the companies operating around the lake, which pump out waste 24 hours a day, the results of ongoing radiation and toxicity tests carried out on the lake have been kept secret and officials have refused to publicly acknowledge health risks to nearby villages.

There are 17 ‘rare earth metals’ – the name doesn’t mean they are necessarily in short supply; it refers to the fact that the metals occur in scattered deposits of minerals, rather than concentrated ores. Rare earth metals usually occur together, and, once mined, have to be separated.

Neodymium is commonly used as part of a Neodymium-Iron-Boron alloy (Nd2Fe14B) which, thanks to its tetragonal crystal structure, is used to make the most powerful magnets in the world. Electric motors and generators rely on the basic principles of electromagnetism, and the stronger the magnets they use, the more efficient they can be. It’s been used in small quantities in common technologies for quite a long time – hi-fi speakers, hard drives and lasers, for example. But only with the rise of alternative energy solutions has neodymium really come to prominence, for use in hybrid cars and wind turbines. A direct-drive permanent-magnet generator for a top capacity wind turbine would use 4,400lb of neodymium-based permanent magnet material.

In the pollution-blighted city of Baotou, most people wear face masks everywhere they go.
‘You have to wear one otherwise the dust gets into your lungs and poisons you,’ our taxi driver tells us, pulling over so we can buy white cloth masks from a roadside hawker."

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Carbon Trading is Hitler-style Genocide!

The global carbon dioxide cap-and-trade scheme which The Greens and Julia Gillard will attemp to ram through the Australian Parliament if they get their Carbon Tax up, along with similar legislation pending in the U.S. and other countries, will reduce the world’s human population by billions—and that is its intent.

The lie of human-induced climate change, was first hatched more than three decades ago by leaders of the British eugenics-cum-environmental movement, led by HRH Prince Philip. It was first championed by Margaret Thatcher’s science guru Sir Crispin Tickell, along with Australia’s very own eugenicist-cum-scientist Sir Frank MacFarlane Burnet. It has nothing to do with science. It is a British imperial doctrine to justify wiping out nation states—and billions of human beings—in order to secure the continued world rule by the still existing British Empire, the core of whose power is the now-collapsing, privately-controlled international monetary system.

Those, Prince Philip-centred circles pushing the global warming fraud, targeted human CO2 emissions as its ostensible cause, because CO2 is the natural, and necessary, by-product of the industrial activity that sustains human life—energy, agriculture, manufacturing etc.

From 2006, their steadily-built hysteria about global warming erupted into a full-blown public relations offensive behind Al Gore and his quack movie, An Inconvenient Truth. Gore himself, an intimate of Royal princes Philip and Charles, led the push for a global financial “trade” in CO2 emissions as the “solution”, a trade from which he himself is raking in the dough.

Now, in the countdown to December’s United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, set as the artificial deadline for the enactment of a global cap-and-trade scheme, governments are being ordered to pass enabling legislation. Before his timely demise British lackey Kevin Rudd had positioned Australia at the front of the herd, by his determination to ram the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme bill through the Senate as soon as possible.

While Rudd’s push had provoked a growing backlash, as in the National Party, the Institute of Public Affairs (a local arm of the British Crown’s free-trading Mont Pelerin Society), and The Australian newspaper, these clowns have limited their arguments to such impotent proclamations as: “cutting Australia’s emissions, and not China’s, won’t make a difference”; “it will cost jobs”; and “carbon storage by agriculture and forestry shouldn’t be excluded”.

Others, including competent, and well-meaning scientists, have exposed “global warming” as the sort of mumbo-jumbo fakery which would almost put a witch-doctor to shame.

However, what none of these groups will say, is that those who created and now champion the global warming fraud, did, and do so, in order to commit genocide.

A killing formula

When inmates at the German chemical giant I.G. Farben’s Auschwitz concentration camp were provided barely 800 calories of food per day, it killed them as surely as the gas chambers and firing squads!

The world condemned it as genocide.

By the same measure, environmental policies that suppress energy consumption, and deny populations the normal economic development to generate sufficient sources of energy, are equally genocide.

Take Africa, for instance. Ninety per cent of people in sub-Saharan Africa lack electricity, running water, proper sanitation and decent housing, and therefore die, in the millions, from malaria, malnutrition, TB, HIV/AIDS, and intestinal diseases.

Not satisfied with those death rates, the British are ramming through their policy of “carbon reduction” in countries across the continent, typified by the recent decree by the Environment Minister of Chad. He banned the manufacture, importation, and use of charcoal— the sole source of fuel for 99 per cent of the Chad population— declaring, “With climate change every citizen must protect his environment.”

His sudden decree unleashed chaos and rioting in the country, which the government forcibly suppressed. The British imperialists led by Prince Philip openly intend to impose African-style conditions upon most of the rest of the world.

Information provided by The Citizens Electoral Council

Memo to Tony Abbott: Bob Brown’s Not the Only Queen Behind Gillard’s Carbon Tax

Clyde Reaction At Claims The Greens Are Conservationists

Tony Abbott is seemingly torn between his tender devotion to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, and his instinctive fear of the political rage of the Australian people, who are rising up against the carbon tax they recognise will destroy them, a tax which has been dictated by … his own Queen.

One month before the 2009 Copenhagen climate change fiasco the Queen revealed herself to be not the powerless figurehead she usually pretends to be, when in her keynote address she ordered the 

Commonwealth nations assembled at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Trinidad and Tobago to take the lead in adopting suicidal “solutions” to a (non-existent) climate change crisis:

“The Commonwealth can be proud of the fact that in each of its six decades, it has shaped the international response to emerging global challenges”, she intoned. “And on this, the eve of the UN Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change, the Commonwealth has an opportunity to lead once more. The threat to our environment is not a new concern. But it is now a global challenge which will continue to affect the security and stability of millions for years to come. … In a world where political, economic and environmental problems and opportunities cross continents, the Commonwealth will also need to prove its relevance beyond its own borders and develop a truly global perspective.”

Despite the ongoning exposure of the supposed “threat” of climate change she was marshalling her Empire to support what is a scientific fraud cooked up by British eugenicists under the sponsorship of her own husband:
  • Prince Philip joined with the Netherlands’ Prince Bernhard—a former member of Hitler’s SS—and British Eugenics Society President Sir Julian Huxley in 1961 to found the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), to raise funds for Huxley’s International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN); Huxley stated that the goal of the new IUCN/WWF-led movement of “environmentalism” was to implement the racist goals of eugenics, but “by other language”, given that Hitler had given eugenics a bad name.
  • The Greens will not admit that the purpose of “environmentalism”, like eugenics, is to reduce the world’s population, to “cull the human herd”, as Prince Philip has repeatedly demanded, a view shared by his minions in the entire Australian Green movement he personally fostered—the Australian Conservation Foundation, WWF Australia, Sustainable Population Australia, and the Wentworth Group, among others. It is no accident, for instance, that the Greens are now leading the charge for euthanasia in Australia, to just plain murder the old and the ill.
  • Huxley’s cousin, Sir Crispin Tickell, a sometime featured speaker to the British Eugenics Society, who once proclaimed that “Mankind is a disease”, personally launched the present crusade against so-called “global warming” in the late 1970s, boasting that as British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s principal science adviser, he had “persuaded her of the importance of climate change”. Among his other activities, Tickell wrote Thatcher’s speeches on climate change, including her 1988 speech to the UN as the first national leader to demand global action; he directed Thatcher to pour funds for the study of global warming into the British Meteorological Office led by John Houghton, which along with the discredited Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University is the source of most of the harum-scarum, idiotic computer-modelled climate change scenarios; and as British Ambassador to the UN from 1987-1990, he organised the establishment of the presently dictatorial Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988, with Houghton chairing its scientific assessment office. Britain’s current high priest of climate change, Sir Nicholas Stern, is Tickell’s protégé. 

Friday, March 11, 2011

Global Warming May Cause Erectile Dysfunction!

Just How Low (Sic) Will The Alarmists Go?

I could not believe my eyes when I came across this internet article!

"Yes that’s right! According to the latest alarmist hysteria global warming causes “deflation.”  No, not the monetary kind (although that may be the next round of hysterics), by deflation, I mean the kind you need Viagra for. Per this article on World Net Daily.
Global warming may make the world’s inhabitants cranky and stressed, drive them crazy, give them cancer and even worsen their suffering from sexual dysfunction, according to a new government report on climate change – but the scientists say more money is needed before they can be certain.
 Worldwide, look how tax dollars are being wasted.
Government scientists from several taxpayer-funded agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institute of Environmental Health Science, the State Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, compiled an 80-page report titled, “A Human Health Perspective on Climate Change: A Report Outlining the Research Needs on the Human Health Effects of Climate Change.”
Yes, it took at least 4 agencies to come up with this bullshit, which you can read by clicking on the link in the above quote.

It gets even better. While I was looking for additional information on this topic I found this here.
Climate change brings some rather unexpected findings, and sometimes a happy outcome for some – take the male Scottish Grey Seal, for instance.
These findings show that climate change, whilst endangering many species, could also help to increase the genetic diversity of some species,” Twiss said. Scottish Seal hanky-panky, it seems, is rife.
So, if you’re a Scottish Gray Seal global warming means you’ll have a much easier time getting laid.  Lucky devils.

It gets crazier, real CO2 Insanity, I also found this, from no less of a publication than Nature.
Rising temperatures look set to produce male-only offspring in the tuatara, condemning the ancient reptile species to extinction by 2085, computer modelling predicts.
So if you’re one of these lizards, it’s going to really be bad.  Soon there will be no females of the species and you’ll be hanging around in Gay Bars trying to pickup that hunk next to you with the tight buns wearing a Greens T shirt.

Dont’ think it’s over yet….it gets sillier yet.  Here we have an article from Canadian Free Press titled “Sex Causes Global Warming.” That’s right! Now if you get laid, it’s bad for the environment!
Sex causes global warming. At least that is what the folks up at Oregon State say:
“A study by statisticians at Oregon State University concluded that in the United States, the carbon legacy and greenhouse gas impact of an extra child is almost 20 times more important than some of the other environmentally sensitive practices people might employ their entire lives – things like driving a high mileage car, recycling, or using energy-efficient appliances and light bulbs.”
 I can just see the headlines:

"Greens Insist Gillard Brings In Nookie Tax"

Germany Dumps Global Warming – Climate Disruption is Last Green Gasp!

If The People Won't Believe Me, I'll Tell 'Em A Bigger Lie!

German ministers and scientists finally abandon the global warming hype and  preach ‘climate disruption’ claims as last hope for new raft of taxes.

Germany’s Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FMER) has signalled a decisive switch in global warming policy. In it’s latest official press release titled, ‘Cold Winter in Europe Does Not Question Climate Change’release (February 22, 2011) Germany’s pro-green government finally fell into line with the U.S. and British environmental campaigners; global warming is dead and ‘climate disruption’ lives in the most populous (82 million inhabitants) nation of the European Union (EU).

Germany has long been a major force in the climate wars and Angela Merkel and her Christian Democratic Union (CDU) government, in particular, have shaped wider EU climate policy. With the realization that scares over catastrophic global warming have fooled no one Merkel is pinning her green taxation hopes on the ‘climate disruption’ banner.

Bait and Switch as Warming is Out and Disruption is In

The FMER, however, was not quite letting go of the global warming narrative as it reared its ugly head more than once in the press announcement. But in a bait and switch move that Julia Gillard would have been proud of the Germans obfuscated their outmoded global warming hype amongst the increasing and contradictory body of evidence showing cooling. The German version of the global warming spin machine has now switched over to a ‘climate disruption’ narrative instead.

In it’s statement, despite conceding that “December in Germany was four degrees colder than average” FMER fiendishly insist that such cold is, in fact, proof of ‘climate disruption’ – a belated tacit admission that global warming had, in fact, stopped in 1998.

The German government line now is that, “all over the world more and more humans seem to suffer from extreme weather conditions. The torrential floods in Australia or the centenary fires in Russia last summer: aren’t they unambiguous signs of climate change?”

Er, no, FMER, that’s not the best way to do it! Aren’t climatologists constantly telling us that weather events are not climate?

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Sink The Greens

We shooters and fishers really need to keep getting the word out there or we WILL loose our sports.

The Greens and Labor cannot be trusted - look no further then the big carbon tax lie of Gillard.

I have gone around three jetties (see photo) and a boat ramp on Lake Illawarra and placed these brochure holders that I made out of plastic fruit juice containers with the top cut off and pasted the front of the Fishing brochure on them. 

I placed about a dozen of the brochures in each container  and used 2" - sorry, old fart lingo -  50mm clear cellotape to bind them to uprights on the jetties. I check them twice a week to see if they need topping up.

I have seen a lot of political rubbish go down in my 65 years and we shooters and fishers will become part of that history unless we do something to help ourselves. So I ask you folks, get off your bum and DO SOMETHING or you WILL LOOSE YOUR GUNS AND FISHING SPOTS!

There must be places in your region where, at minimal cost to yourself, you can help.

Ring head office of the Shooters & Fishers Party to find out who in your area has a supply of brochure.

We have two weeks to try and secure the future of outdoor sporst because off road driving/riding and vehicular acess to National Parks will be the next target.

Carbon Tax To Increase Water Rates.

The Green-Labor-Independent government may not have worked out what the cost of a carbon tax would be on Australian working families but others are working it out very quickly!

Modelling by the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment has estimated that a $25 carbon tax will increase Victorian's water costs by $20 million per year. Geelong, Ballarat and Bendigo water retailers would have to find another $1.2 million each from their consumers.

Carbon tax caused water price increases will be on top of the 45 per cent increase in water prices over the last three years, partly due to the proliferation of desalination plants which a former Labor Premier of New South Wales described as "bottled electricity". 

There have been so many "former Labor Premiers of NSW" you will have to look up which idiot it was!

Climate Change Minister in The Greens/Labor government, Greg Combet said on Fran Kelly's Radio National Breakfast that a carbon tax would not be a tax on consumers. 

Combet you are wrong - it is a tax on consumers.

Water authorities won't just absorb the cost they will push it on to the punters and the punters will pay.

So when your clock radio tells you to get out of bed, that little red light is to remind you that Julia has been taxing you through the night. As you do your ablutions, they're taxing you brushing your teeth, as you turn on the light they're taxing you reading the paper, as you iron your shirt they're taxing you for removing every crease.

Mr Combet you will be taxing everything, it is the ultimate tax on the consumer and bullshit will not stand in proxy for a lack of detail.

And Ms Gillard the Australian people will not tolerate being utterly and calculatingly misled.

Information stolen (LOL) from Barnaby Joyce.

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Miss Tweedledum Vs Fatty O'Barrel - And the Looser Is - The Citizens of NSW

In a couple of weeks we unfortunates living in NSW have to toddle off to vote.

Our choices are very limited.

We have little Miss Tweedledum (the one with the smaller nose) who presided over the latter part of the self destruction of what was once a political party for the workers of this state but  unashamedly became the Developers Party with a little help fron The Greens.

In the other corner is Mr Neverwasbeen, Fatty O'Barrell himself who presides over a party that once was for, well stuff me, I dunno what they were ever for! Can anyone help me here?

Now hidden away, happily maggoting their way through both corpses, there is a third party that have no policies on offer THAT CAN HELP US IN ANY WAY!

They are The Greens and they offer plenty of policies THAT WILL HURT US!

Such as: Death Duties, a Carbon Tax, Ban Fishing, Ban law abiding citizens from owning guns, and an absoloute ripper, close all coal fired power stations and replace them with "renewable energy sources".

WTF does that mean?

Wind generators that make people ill and never run at full capacity, therefore needing a backup gas fired generator?

Britian gives us a huge heads up on what will happen if coal mines and coal fired power stations are closed in NSW but don't wait for it to hit the mainstream media.

Steven Holliday, Chief Executice Officer of Britians largest energy supplier, National Grid, issued a stark warning of the consequences of Britain "going green". The National Grid is one of the most lucrative privatized monoplies in the world.

Mr Holliday stated that because there will be massive power shortages in Britain bought about by going green:

“Families will have to get used to only using power when it was available, rather than constantly.”

And that, folks, is the green agenda in a nutshell. Take us back to the dark ages.

I wonder will Bob Brown's little lovenest in Tasmania share the same fate?

I very much doubt it.

If you are in anyway interested the whole story is here.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Nuclear Power Had To Bail Out Wind Turbine Industry!

A Blighted Landscape That Sickens Nearby Residents.

Scarcely a day goes by without more evidence to show why the Green's obsession with wind turbines is one of the greatest political blunders of our time.

Under a target agreed with the EU, Britain is committed within ten years — at astronomic expense — to generating nearly a third of its electricity from renewable sources, mainly through building thousands more wind turbines.

However the penny is finally dropping for almost everyone — except our politicians — that to rely on windmills to keep our lights on is a colossal and very dangerous act of self-deception.

Take, for example, a 350ft monstrosity in England that performed so poorly (working at only 15 per cent of its capacity) that the $260,000 government subsidy given to its owners was more than the $200,000 worth of electricity it produced last year!

That's right, one wind turbine made a net loss of $60,000!

Meanwhile, official figures have confirmed that during those freezing, windless weeks around Christmas in England, when electricity demand was at record levels, the contribution made by Britain’s 3,500 turbines was minuscule. 

To keep British homes warm they were having to import vast amounts of power from nuclear reactors in France.

So a question to Bob Brown of the Greens:

"When you close most of our coal fired power stations as you intend to do, where will our electricity come from? We don't have any nuclear power plants!"

Wind turbines are so expensive that Holland recently became the first country in Europe to abandon its EU renewable energy target, announcing that it is to slash its annual subsidy by billions of euros.

Read more: