IPCC's Whitewash 'Review' is the AGW Camp's Biggest Mistake Yet

Gerald Warner from the Telegraph.co.uk reports:

"It looks as if the tottering IPCC has just made its biggest mistake yet. Twenty-four hours after the announcement of an “independent” inquiry into certain aspects of its activities it is possible to make a considered assessment of its significance. By any reasoned analysis, it is not only a whitewash but one in which the paint is spread so thinly as to be transparent.

First, who appointed this review body? Those two iconic standard bearers of climate science objectivity, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and IPCC head (still!) Rajendra Pachauri.

There is nothing like being judge in your own cause – it secures a less damaging verdict.

Ban Ki-moon is the clown who, on a visit to the Arctic last September, despairingly proclaimed that “100 billion tons” of polar ice were melting each year, when the sea-ice around him had just extended itself by half a million square kilometres more than at the same time the previous year.

Pachauri, among many other solecisms, is also the buffoon who denounced criticism of the IPCC’s absurd claims about melting Himalayan glaciers as “voodoo science”.

The review will be conducted by the Inter-Academy Council and headed by its co-chairman Professor Robbert Dijkgraaf, who recently broadcast on Dutch radio a complacent statement about the “consensus” on climate science.

The Inter-Academy Council is a representative body for a number of national academies of science, most of which are committed to the climate change cause. So, a very obvious whitewash and presumably very satisfactory to the IPCC camp.

Nevertheless, I repeat, it is probably the most serious mistake the AGW fanatics have so far made. This is because they have seriously underestimated the amount of trouble they are in.

See the rest of the article at:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100029630/climategate-the-ipccs-whitewash-review-is-the-agw-camps-biggest-mistake-yet/

Would This Work in Australia?

Here we go again!

Another article that has, on the surface, stuff all to do with Climate Fraud. However if you trace the lineage of Climate Fraud back to its beginnings you find the same ideologists who are behind gun control for law abiding citizens but open slather for the poor misunderstood criminals!

RISKY SHOOTING IN SELF DEFENCE

“This was the bed-wetting headline of the lead editorial in the August 14, 2005 edition of ‘The Commercial Appeal’ in Memphis in the good ole US of A.

Jacob Evans was robbed at gunpoint by a duo of armed thugs two weeks before he undertook his “risky” behaviour. It seems that ‘The Commercial Appeal’ finds nothing risky for a victim to be held at gunpoint by armed robbers.

Evans went and bought a .357 from a friend the day after the first robbery. Happily, he was not a day late AND a life short.

The same punks abducted Evans at gunpoint (they must have by then decided he was their personal piggy bank). They forced themselves into his car and made him drive them to his bank where they ordered him to draw out $10,000. Since Evans did not have a withdrawal slip, one of the duo went to get one.

That was the moment that Evans chose to pull out his .357 and shoot the other bad guy who was still in the car. Evans did not just shoot him once, he emptied the gun into Leverett Dickson, hitting him with all six rounds. Good for Evans. He made sure that his kidnapper could no longer hurt him.

‘The Commercial Appeal’ was in a dither that the armed robber might have returned fire before he died. Or, that the accomplice might have returned and shot Evans. Or that the ensuing gunfight might have endangered an innocent bystander.

The anti-self defence crowd does not get it. For the second time in less than a month, Evans was victimized by the same pair. The kidnappers were in the process of looting his bank account. Does the Commercial Appeal really think that Evans was going to be told to drop the kidnappers at their house and be wished a good day?

Whatever were Evans’ risks in the actions he took, they were almost certainly less than the risk he faced of being deposited in the landfill later that day.

Oh, and the now-in-custody accomplice? Ninety-nine times out of a hundred, bad guys — even when they are armed — flee when the victim starts shooting, because at that point the tables have been turned and the element of surprise is working in behalf of the victim. Which is what bad guy number two actually did.

As if reading from some gun control talking points playbook, the editorial (in ‘The Commercial Appeal’) raised the problem that a gun might get stolen and be “accidentally discharged by children.” Better that Evans be dead than run the remote risk of some kid stealing his gun. And let’s say it plainly — when the kid steals the gun, he(the kid) is a criminal!

Thanks to Ron Owen in Gympie for this little gem.

It just goes to prove that the police can't stop an intruder, stalker, or mugger from hurting you. They can pursue him only after he has hurt or killed you. Protecting yourself from harm is your responsibility, and you are far less likely to be hurt in a neighbourhood of gun-owners than in one of disarmed citizens - even if you don't own a gun!

However, in the era of the "Social Experiment" now going on, you are not permitted self defense. If you think the Social Experiment is a Labor only invention, let me remind you who really disarmed Australia. Little Johhny Howard, who wore a bullet proof vest to a meeting of gun owners opposed to his views!

This made all firearm owners appear to be assasians. However, worse still, it made Howard appear a brave man!

Church of Climatology Overwhelmed by Fear, Panic and Deranged Hatred as Their 'science' Collapses !

James Delingpole of The Telegraph.co.uk reports on his debate with George Monbiot, a journalist with the UK Guardian and a rabid member of the Church of Climatology:


"A sharp-eyed viewer has noticed that when I was debating George Monbiot on TV yesterday and I mentioned that his cherished “peer-reviewed science” had been discredited by Climategate he bared his teeth like a cornered cur. Says body language expert John Lish:

“It was a quite aggressive and defensive gesture which was noticeable when he was attempting to dismiss you (talking about peer review). A definite body-language sign of being rattled. He’s definitely uncomfortable about what’s occurring and others will have spotted that as well.”

Monbiot tried it on yesterday with his free two and half minute propaganda broadcast generously funded by the BBC’s The Daily Politics show in which he rehashed all his old arguments (man’s selfishness, rising sea-levels, plight of the poor, wind farms, blah di blah di blah) as though Climategate, Glaciergate, Pachaurigate, Amazongate, Africagate et al had never happened."

Monbiot was recently carved up by Professor Ian Plimer on Australian TV despite warmist moderator Tony Jones of the ABC constantly interupting Professor Plimer, however never once interrupting Monbiot.

Read the full post here:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100028525/warmists-overwhelmed-by-fear-panic-and-deranged-hatred-as-their-science-collapses/

Do You Really Know Your Theology?

Who was the third man to walk on water?

The first one was Jesus.

The second one was the apostle Peter.

Who was the third?

Scroll down to find out!

I think it was this bloke!

Fifty Ships Stuck in Ice in Baltic Sea

This sort of information must be so embarrasing for the members of the global warming cult!

I can just see them thrashing around in anguish as their pathetic little belief system is further undermined. However, just as cult members do, they reject the reality of what is presented to them and continue on with their fantasy.

Here is the article direct from news.com and not one squeak so far from The Church of Climatology!

"AROUND 50 ships, including large ferries reportedly carrying thousands, were stuck in the ice in the Baltic Sea today and many were not likely to be freed for hours, Swedish maritime authorities said."

"Around 50 commercial vessels are waiting for help from ice breakers (and) we have had as many as six large passenger ferries stuck, but have managed to free two of them," Johny Lindvall of the Swedish Maritime Administration's ice breaker unit said.

He said that two large Viking Line ferries that regularly shuttle thousands of passengers between Sweden and Finland were among the four ferries still stuck in the ice.

According to the TT news agency, the two ferries were the Isabella and the Amorella and were in total carrying 2630 passengers."

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/fifty-ships-stuck-in-ice-in-baltic/story-e6frfku0-1225837189030

10 Rreasons (of 100!) Why Anthropogenic Global Warming is a Cult

The Prophet! or is that profit!

Is belief in Anthropogenic Global Warming a cult?

Apply this 10 point Cult Test and you tell us. Read each one, adding one point for each statement that rings as true. Total up the score and tell us, on a scale of 0 to 10, what you come up with. Well, it really should be a score between 1 to 10, as there can be no person alive, even if a member of the cult, that could not agree with point #1.

Cult leader Al Gore, is so “always right” that his devotees don’t even question the fact that he will debate no one.

Ever. Anywhere.

1. The Guru is always right.
“The Guru, his church, and his teachings are always right, and above criticism, and beyond reproach.”

2. You are always wrong.
“Cult members are also told that they are in no way qualified to judge the Guru or his church. Should you disagree with the leader or his cult about anything, see Cult Rule Number One. Having negative emotions about the cult or its leader is a “defect” that needs to be fixed.”

3. No Exit.
“There is simply no proper or honorable way to leave the cult. Period. To leave is to fail, to die, to be defeated by evil. To leave is to invite divine retribution.”

4. No Graduates.
“No one ever learns as much as the Guru knows; no one ever rises to the level of the Guru’s wisdom, so no one ever finishes his or her training, and nobody ever graduates.”

5. Cult-speak.
“The cult has its own language. The cult invents new terminology or euphemisms for many things. The cult may also redefine many common words to mean something quite different. Cult-speak is also called “bombastic redefinition of the familiar”, or “loading the language”.”

6. Group-think, Suppression of Dissent, and Enforced Conformity in Thinking
“The cult has standard answers for almost everything, and members are expected to parrot those answers. Willfulness or independence or skeptical thinking is seen as bad. Members accept the leader’s reality as their own.”

7. Irrationality.
“The beliefs of the cult are irrational, illogical, or superstitious, and fly in the face of evidence to the contrary.”

8. Suspension of disbelief.
“The cult member is supposed to take on a childish naïveté, and simply believe whatever he is told, no matter how unlikely, unrealistic, irrational, illogical, or outrageous it may be. And he does.”

9. Denigration of competing sects, cults, religions, groups, or organizations.
“This is commonplace, and hardly needs any explanation.”

10. Personal attacks on critics.
“Anyone who criticizes the Guru, the cult or its dogma is attacked on a personal level.”

Now go to Climategate.com at the link below and see another 90 reasons why AGW seriously resembles a cult:

http://www.climategate.com/100-reasons-why-anthropogenic-global-warming-a-cult

The Picture

I am really selfish today.

I have put this item in my blog, not because it has anything to do with global warming but because I am selfish.

I am selfish because, until just over three years ago, I had a son just like the mother in this picture has a son.

I want you to take a real good look at this picture. Take in every detail and remember all you can about it!

Look at it!

Don't fuck off and watch TV or guzzle a stubby!

LOOK AT IT!

Now please scroll down and read David Cox' blog concerning this picture.

"This was a perfectly healthy twenty two-year-old young man who in the service of his country got half of his head blown off.

I think that’s important, I think that’s newsworthy.

Let me tell you how newsworthy I think it is. I think that it’s more important than chocolate cake recipes and far more important than comic book reviews. It is more important than who fell and whose swell at the winter Olympic games.

It is far more important than any self-serving load of crap banged out by Pseudo doctor Amy. It is more important than American Idol or Lost or any other mindless goat droppings the public chooses to chew on.

This is some American mother’s son, her little boy, he may be gay or straight or transgender but his life is fucked forever.

How did this come to happen to this poor mother’s son?

It came to happen because the people in the media who are supposed to foster a public debate on such public issues as war instead used their franchise to promote articles about chocolate cake and comic book reviews.

They see their free press as free to choose not to look when bad thinks happen.

They feel no need to explain to his parents or to anyone that the war that blew off half of this poor boys head was based on out and out lies.

It was a war perpetrated by people who hoped to gain from it be it in oil or pipelines or service contracts and like the media they don’t care that this mother’s son is mangled and mutilated.

Do you care? "

You can read the rest of David Cox' blog here:

http://open.salon.com/blog/david_cox/2010/02/25/the_picture

Or you can fuck off and watch TV and guzzle a beer!